David D. Leishman

Senior Counsel

Related Content

Practices
Industries
Education
  • University of Minnesota Law School, JD, magna cum laude, Order of the Coif, Lead Note & Comment Editor; Staff, Minnesota Law Review, 2006
  • Wheaton College, BA, with Honors, 1996
Admissions
  • Illinois
  • Minnesota

Dave is an experienced labor and employment litigator and counselor.  His practice focuses on federal court litigation involving unfair competition and theft of trade secrets and violations of the ADA, FMLA, ADEA, Title VII, and other federal and state anti-discrimination and anti-retaliation laws. Dave also regularly represents clients in labor arbitration and before the National Labor Relations Board and counsels clients on difficult wage and hour and overtime exemption issues.

Dave was a judicial law clerk to the Honorable G. Barry Anderson of the Minnesota Supreme Court from 2006 to 2007. While earning his law degree from the University of Minnesota, Dave was honored with the Burton Award.

Dave is also guest faculty at Wheaton (IL) College, where he teaches Business Law.

In the News

David D Leishman
vCard
T: +1 312 750 8680F: +1 312 698 453177 West Wacker Drive
Suite 4100
Chicago, IL 60601-1818

On behalf of transportation industry client, obtained summary judgment and dismissal of case in which plaintiff asserted claims of race discrimination, gender discrimination, harassment, wrongful termination, retaliation, defamation, and intentional infliction of emotional distress. 

Defended food and beverage industry client and newly-hired employee against claims that employee unlawfully solicited prior employer’s customers in violation of non-competition agreement and stole prior employer’s trade secrets.  Case settled on confidential terms.

Defended transportation industry client against competitor’s claim that client engaged in a nationwide scheme to unlawfully solicit competitor’s employees and induce them to breach alleged contractual obligations to competitor.  Case settled on confidential terms. 

Obtained injunction on behalf of financial industry client against former employee who accepted employment with a competitor and solicited client’s customers on behalf of competitor. 

Representation of unionized manufacturer in negotiation of new incentive plan.

Representation in trade secrets and unfair competition case involving forensic evidence of several employees’ theft of customer information followed by their simultaneous resignation to form a competing business. Case settled on confidential terms.

Representation in trade secrets and unfair competition case involving an employee who solicited clients on behalf of a competitor before resigning to work for that competitor. Case settled on confidential terms.

Representation of corporation and individual manager accused by a former Financial Advisor of gender discrimination, harassment, retaliation, and wrongful termination. Case settled on confidential terms.

Representation of corporation accused of disability discrimination by a former forklift operator. The Court ordered that Plaintiff was barred from any recovery by his failure to disclose his claim as an asset in his pending bankruptcy proceeding. Chestnut v. United Natural Foods, Inc., No. 1:12-cv-0467 (S.D. Ind. Nov. 1, 2012).

Representation in $400 million coverage claim case. Obtained dismissal. UnitedHealth Group Inc. v. Hiscox Dedicated Corp. Member Ltd., No. 09-CV-0210 PJS/SRN, 2010 WL 550991 (D. Minn. Feb. 9, 2010).

Representation related to $500,000 life insurance benefits claim case. Obtained summary judgment in client's favor. Appeldorn v. Hartford Life & Accident Insurance Co., No. 1:09-cv-069 (D.N.D. Sept. 2, 2010)

Representation in life insurance benefits case. On appeal to the Eighth Circuit Court of Appeals, obtained reversal of district court judgment in favor of plaintiffs in claim for life insurance benefits. Matschiner v. Hartford Life & Accident Insurance Co., No. 09-3576 (8th Cir. Oct. 7, 2010). The Eighth Circuit held that the defendant insurer complied with ERISA's "plan documents rule," as explained in the Supreme Court's decision in Kennedy v. Plan Administrator for DuPont Savings & Investment Plan, 129 S. Ct. 865 (2009).

Representation in racial bias and discrimination case. Obtained summary judgment on plaintiff's claims. Julie Delgado-O'Neil v. City of Minneapolis, No. 08-4924 (D. Minn. Aug. 13, 2010)

Co-author, "Court finds no individual supervisor liability for retaliation," Federal Employment Law Insider, September 2013
Author, Adding Insult to Injury: ERISA, Knudson, and the Error of the Possession Theory, 89 Minn. L. Rev. 1214, 2005