Gilbert C. Dickey Associate - Not admitted in DC; admitted in Alabama and West Virginia. Application for admission to the D.C. bar pending; working under the direct supervision of an enrolled, active member of the D.C. bar.

Gilbert is an associate in the firm’s Business and Securities Litigation group and a member of the Appeals and Issues Group. His practice focuses on appellate litigation and dispositive motions in trial courts.

Before joining McGuireWoods, Gilbert served as a law clerk to Justice Clarence Thomas of the Supreme Court of the United States and Judge William H. Pryor Jr. of the U.S. Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit. He also served as an assistant attorney general working for the solicitor general in the Office of the West Virginia Attorney General. In that role, he focused on appellate matters and defending important state legislation in constitutional litigation.

Gilbert has successfully argued appeals in the U.S. Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit and the West Virginia Supreme Court of Appeals. He has authored briefs in the Supreme Court of the United States, U.S. Court of Appeals for the Fourth and Eleventh Circuits, and multiple state supreme courts.

Gilbert graduated with high honors from the University of Chicago Law School.

Experience

Morrisey v. West Virginia AFL-CIO, 804 S.E.2d 883 (W. Va. 2017) Authored briefs successfully urging reversal of preliminary injunction of West Virginia’s right-to-work law.

Hester v. Ballard, 679 F. App’x 273 (4th Cir. 2017) Argued successfully for denial of habeas corpus in a case involving alleged Full Faith and Credit, Equal Protection, and Due Process violations.

Anstey v. Ballard, 237 W. Va. 411 (2016) Argued that developments in the investigation of arson were not a basis for a new trial in a state postconviction proceeding. The West Virginia Supreme Court of Appeals upheld the denial of a new trial.

State v. Noel, 236 W. Va. 335 (2015) Argued that West Virginia Supreme Court of Appeals should adopt a rule that reasonable suspicion for a stop can be based on a reasonable mistake of law.

Franchise Tax Board of California v. Hyatt, 136 S. Ct. 1807 (2016) Drafted an amicus brief joined by 44 states urging the Supreme Court to hold that a state is immune from suit in the courts of another state. The Court divided evenly on the question.

  • Alabama
  • West Virginia
  • Not Admitted in the District of Columbia
  • U.S. Court of Appeals for the 4th Circuit
  • U.S. Court of Appeals for the 11th Circuit
  • U.S. District Court for the Northern District of West Virginia
  • U.S. District Court for the Southern District of West Virginia
  • The University of Chicago Law School, JD, with High Honors, Kirkland and Ellis Scholar, Order of the Coif, 2012
  • Samford University, BA, History and Political Science, magna cum laude, 2009
Back to top