Sid uses his extensive trial, crisis and negotiating experience to bring people together – rather than divide them. Whether it is connecting with clients, co-counsel, witnesses, opponents, judges or juries, Sid understands that persuasion begins with listening and developing trust.
Sid serves as General Counsel of the National Asian Pacific American Bar Association (NAPABA), and is a frequent lecturer on mediation and litigation issues.
After a three week jury trial, obtained a unanimous defense verdict for a pharmaceutical client within one hour of the jury retiring to deliberate a wrongful death case in which plaintiffs' counsel chose the initial trial case and touted a prior 4-0 plaintiff jury verdict record against other manufacturers of the same pharmaceutical product.
Negotiated and amicably resolved, in about 6 months, without formal litigation or mediator assistance, a highly contentious and complex high-end resort condominium real estate dispute involving nearly 100 parties.
Upon stepping in to try a highly contentious wage/hour mass action, initiated settlement discussions and a class settlement after lunch with opposing counsel.
On the eve of trial, obtained a multimillion-dollar settlement for a brand holder client in a brand damage dispute against an overseas consumer product manufacturer.
In preparing for a wage/hour class action trial, developed creative graphics and storyboards to simplify the facts and crystalize themes that had the unexpected consequence of causing a settlement on the eve of trial (a day after the graphics were exchanged).
Settled a class action lawsuit with a non-class settlement, approved by the court, that resolved a high profile food supplement case involving professional athletes without any significant publicity.
On the eve of trial, obtained a $49 million settlement as lead class counsel for the largest class of lawyers and law students in a complex and highly contentious antitrust lawsuit.
Helped create the political will to compel FEMA, the State of Louisiana, and one of the most devastated Parishes in Louisiana to pay $24 million (100 percent of invoices) to several contractors who provided hazardous waste cleanup services in the wake of Hurricanes Katrina and Rita when legal remedies were inadequate.
Obtained a unanimous and complete defense verdict in a sexual harassment jury trial on behalf of a major Hollywood studio and thereby avoided a judgment, attorney's fees, and embarrassing publicity for the client.
Resolved a series of highly complex multimillion-dollar partnership, building management, and practice management lawsuits on behalf of a world-renown medical group against two major publicly traded companies, without formal discovery.
Reduced a multibillion-dollar California Business and Professions Code Section 17200 claim that was prosecuted by the district attorneys of nine counties against a cement manufacturer, to a low six-figure administrative fine and reimbursement. This result was achieved over three years through a series of meetings and correspondence that extensively explored constitutional limitations on government fines and penalties, case law interpretations of Section 17200, the admissibility of extrapolation evidence, and the likely impact of expected trial presentations. The complaint and stipulated final consent judgment were filed the same day and received no press coverage.
Removed a product manufacturer client from a 30-party construction defect case with severe personal injury allegations, by actively engaging with co-defendants to minimize disputes among defendants, reducing costs through the use of a joint electronic system, and multiple meals and meetings with plaintiffs' counsel.
Used a variety of legal and interpersonal strategies to prevent an attempted takeover of a company, including the filing of a TRO.
Recovered a seven-figure settlement in a major homeowners' association's action, without taking any depositions, and with virtually no other discovery by any party.
Dissuaded a client from immediately filing a lawsuit and instead resolved a multimillion-dollar dispute through informal meetings in a matter of months. These negotiations saved a valuable business relationship that our client thought was unsalvageable.
After a month-long trial virtually no one thought he could win, Sid defended a grocery chain against a highly contentious contempt action by the California attorney general and several private environmental groups over an alleged breach of a Proposition 65 consent judgment. Sid subdued plaintiffs’ populist cause and turned the spotlight on plaintiffs’ less-than-honest conduct in attempting to enforce the consent judgment.
In actions brought in California and Nevada, Sid recovered 100 percent of his clients’ original investment plus attorneys’ fees and assisted a Receiver in recovering more than $40 million for a medical device company when improper cash transfers of private placement funds reduced the company’s available cash from more than $30 million to less than $100,000 by the time his clients initiated a shareholders’ derivative lawsuit that eventually led to the appointment of the Receiver and this recovery.
Helped a homeowners association recover $2 million from its insurer in an earthquake damage dispute.
In defense of a client manufacturer in a breach of contract lawsuit by an exclusive distributor, Sid resolved the matter by recovering for the manufacturer more from the distributor than the distributor originally claimed in damages.
Recovered $8 million for a homeowners association in a construction defect case involving more than 50 parties, even though the defendants' cost-of-repair estimates were less than $3 million.
Helped a client reinstate its state-issued administrative letter of authorization when it was revoked by the state agency on questionable grounds. Sid negotiated in direct meetings and actions with the agency to reestablish his client's credibility with the agency. The letter was reinstated and relations with the agency vastly improved.
Obtained a unanimous product liability design defect defense verdict for a manufacturer despite previous and subsequent punitive damage plaintiff verdicts against the same manufacturer for the same product.
For a foreign shipowner, took charge of the largest oil spill in the Port of Los Angeles and became the focal point of all cleanup, government and media relations, and claims. Open the Port’s commercial shipping channels after five days of around-the-clock clean up activities and orchestrated an incentive system that cleaned thousands of contaminated pilings and seven miles of shoreline in three months. Organized a claims office that resolved all 2,000+ claims in three months (600 within two weeks) of the spill. In subsequent litigation, reduced felony charges against client to administrative fines; developed scientific evidence undercutting the U.S. Coast Guard's formerly definitive chemical "fingerprinting" evidence; and proved in a civil trial against another vessel, that 93 percent of the oil came from that other vessel. Ultimately, recovered more than 100 percent of client's clean up and claims expenses, forced adverse experts to admit they could not reduce client's cost-effective clean up and claims expenses, and made the management of this spill the model training template for the U.S. Coast Guard.
Organized crisis team for a client the morning after a death in a silo, and proceeded to take care of the affected employees and families, address OSHA and criminal investigations, deal with union-related issues, and resolved all disputes without unnecessary litigation or adverse publicity.
Despite extreme hostility and complete distrust among the parties, Sid persisted and finally negotiated a very complicated multi-party real estate deal that effectively resolved multiple disputes among the parties.
On the eve of trial, at the request of a major studio client, Sid revised the client's defense storyline and thereby caused a favorable settlement of the case.
Just over a month before the initial trial date, in a very acrimonious case, Sid entered to try the case, refocused the case storyline, created new graphics, and precipitated a favorable settlement.
In a case involving difficult facts, Sid helped key witnesses put the facts in a larger context that effectively undermined the liability and damage exposure of the case.
Named "Most Influential Minority Attorneys," Los Angeles Business Journal, 2018
Recipient, McGuireWoods, Diversity & Inclusion Excellence Award, 2017
Recipient, President's Award, National Asian Pacific American Bar Association (NAPABA), 2014
Named to "Southern California Super Lawyers," Class Action, Super Lawyers, Thomson Reuters, 2004-2019
Fellow, Litigation Counsel of America, 2012
Recipient, G. Duffield Smith Outstanding Publication Award, Defense Research Institute, 2007
Member, American Law Institute
Board Member, Product Liability Advisory Council, Inc.
Member, Maritime Law Association
Board Member, Japanese American Bar Association
Past Chair, Trial Tactics Committee, DRI
Member, Inns of Court, Los Angeles County Bar Association
General Counsel, National Asian Pacific Bar Association
Past Chair, Committee on the Administration of Justice, State Bar of California
Instructor, National Institute for Trial Advocacy
McGuireWoods’ Gregory Evans, Sidney Kanazawa Honored Among Most Influential Minority Attorneys
January 23, 2018
McGuireWoods Lawyers Named Among Southern California 'Super Lawyers' for 2016
January 20, 2016