DOJ Opens New Year with Record Fines in Criminal Cartel Case
reported, in fiscal
year 2011 (the period running from Oct. 1, 2010, through Sept. 30, 2011), the Antitrust Division obtained more than $520 million in criminal fines. On
Jan. 30, 2012, the Division
announced that it had already surpassed that amount for fiscal year 2012 as two Japanese suppliers of automotive electrical
components have agreed to pay a combined $548 million to resolve federal price-fixing and bid-rigging charges in the ongoing auto parts investigation.
In addition, four Japanese nationals, all executives at one of the companies, have agreed to pay $20,000 criminal fines and serve sentences ranging
from 15 months to two years. According to the Division, the auto parts investigation is the largest criminal investigation it has ever pursued, both
in terms of its scope and the potential volume of commerce affected by the alleged anticompetitive conduct.
Canadian Competition Bureau Raises Premerger Notice Threshold
On Feb. 7, 2012, the Canadian rel="noopener noreferrer" Competition Bureau
announced revised thresholds for premerger filings under the Competition Act. These thresholds determine whether companies are required to notify the Bureau
about a proposed transaction. Under the new rules, which are now in effect, parties in a transaction involving a target company with Canadian-based
assets or revenue valued in excess of CA$77 million will be required to notify the Bureau. Parties also will be required to report transactions in
which the total combined assets or revenues exceed CA$400 million.
DOJ and EC Release Patents and Standards Policy Statements
The U.S. Department of Justice (DOJ) and European Commission (EC) both recently released key statements on their policies regarding patents and
standards. On Feb. 13, 2012, the Antitrust Division announced the closing of its investigations into three separate transactions — Google’s
acquisition of Motorola Mobility, a manufacturer of smartphones and computer tablets; the acquisition of Nortel Networks’ patents (at a bankruptcy
auction) by a partnership comprised of Microsoft, Apple, RIM and others; and Apple’s acquisition of patents formerly owned by Novell. Each acquisition
involved standard essential patents (SEPs) that the patent holders had committed to license to industry participants through their participation rel="noopener noreferrer" in
standard-setting organizations (SSOs). In its
closing statement, the Division emphasized the importance to the wireless device industry of seamless interaction with wireless communications technologies and the
need for industry participants to work through SSOs collectively to develop technical standards that establish precise specifications for essential
components of the technology, and stated that it “continues to have concerns about the potential inappropriate rel="noopener noreferrer" use of SEPs in the wireless device
industry.” Similarly, in a
speech presented on Feb. 10, 2012, EC Commissioner Joaquín Almunia expressed concern about “misuse” of SEPs and stated that he is “determined to use
antitrust enforcement to prevent the misuse of patent rights to the detriment of a vigorous and accessible market.”
EU/UK Competition Law
We also publish a newsletter and bulletins on
EU/UK competition law developments.
For more information, please contact the lawyers in the
& Trade Regulation Department at McGuireWoods.