Brian is recognized as one of the leading intellectual property litigators in the nation. He has litigated patent and other intellectual property cases across the country, and has considerable experience in the Eastern District of Virginia, commonly known as the “rocket docket,” a favorite venue for intellectual property litigants.
Brian is repeatedly included in The Best Lawyers in America for intellectual property and was named 2025 “Lawyer of the Year” in Litigation – Patent (Richmond). He has been listed in Chambers USA as one of America’s Leading Lawyers for intellectual property since 2004, and has been described by clients in that publication as a “top-notch litigator” and as a lawyer who “can find a solution when others cannot.” In 2015, The American Lawyer awarded a case on which Brian was lead trial lawyer, “Global Dispute of the Year: U.S. Litigation.” In March 2012, Benchmark Litigation recognized Brian as the Virginia Litigator of the Year. The American Lawyer selected him as its Litigator in the Spotlight in its November 2011 issue, and he was named Litigator of the Week in the September 16, 2011 issue of Am Law Litigation Daily.
Most recently, Brian was the lead trial lawyer for Belvac Production Machinery, which was sued for allegedly infringing three patents relating to machines for making aluminum beverage cans. After a two-week trial, the jury returned a verdict of non-infringement for Belvac. On appeal, the Federal Circuit Court of Appeals invalidated the plaintiff’s patents.
In previous notable cases, Brian was the lead trial lawyer for DuPont in its trade secret case against Kolon Industries. In that case, the jury awarded DuPont $919,900,000 – a precedent setting victory hailed as the “Global Dispute of the Year: U.S. Litigation” in 2015 by The American Lawyer.
Brian is the former chair of the firm’s IP Litigation/Patents Department. He is the current chair of the firm’s Technology Committee, and a co-Team Leader of the firm’s Trade Secrets and Restrictive Covenants Practice Group.
Before starting his career in law, Brian spent an internship performing research in immunology, and was also a supervisor in the datacenter for a major Wall Street investment bank. He was an adjunct professor of law at the T.C. Williams School of Law. His experience also includes serving as law clerk to the Honorable Stephen V. Wilson of the U.S. District Court for the Central District of California.
- Lead trial counsel for DuPont in trade secrets case involving Kevlar®. After eight-week trial, jury awarded DuPont $919.9 million, the largest verdict in Virginia history. E. I. du Pont de Nemours and Company v. Kolon Industries, Inc.
- Lead trial counsel for Sprint in a trademark case involving the Nextel® trademark. The jury returned a verdict for Sprint on all counts.
- Lead trial counsel for Belvac Production Machinery in a case alleging Belvac infringed three patents relating to machines for making aluminum beverage cans. The jury returned a verdict of non-infringement for Belvac, and on appeal the Federal Circuit Court of Appeals invalidated the plaintiff’s patents based on McGuireWoods’ arguments.
- Lead trial counsel for Verizon Wireless and other telecommunications carriers involving alleged patent infringement of wireless aircards. After trial, jury found non-infringement and the plaintiff’s patent invalid. DNT, LLC v. Sprint Nextel Corp., et al.
- Lead trial counsel for Purdue Pharma in patent infringement case involving pharmaceutical product. The case settled favorably for our client after claim construction and with summary judgment motions pending. King Pharmaceuticals, Inc. v. Purdue Pharma L.P.
- Trial counsel for Verizon in its patent infringement case against Vonage involving Voice over Internet Protocol technology. After trial, the jury awarded Verizon $58 million, and the court entered an injunction against Vonage. After appeal, the case settled with a $120 million payment to Verizon. Verizon Services Corp. et al. v. Vonage Holdings Corp., et al.
- Lead trial counsel for plaintiff in this patent infringement case involving wastewater treatment systems. After trial, the jury awarded damages and made a finding of willful infringement. American Manufacturing Company v. Lighthouse Treatment Systems, et al.
- Trial counsel for Infineon in this patent infringement case involving SDRAM and DDR-SDRAM computer memory technology. Rambus, Inc. v. Infineon Technologies AG
Events
- Speaker, "Defense," What You Need to Know: Protection, Enforcement and Defense of Trade Secrets, November 30, 2022
- Speaker, You’ve Mastered Remote Working — Now What About Trade Secret Protection?, May 21, 2020
- Moderator, "Pretrial Matters and Trial Preparation," The Rocket Docket: Trying Cases in the Eastern District of Virginia, Virginia CLE, December 2016
- Speaker, The Rocket Docket 2010: Trying Cases in the Eastern District of Virginia, December 8, 2010
- Speaker, "Pretrial Matters and Trial Preparation," The Rocket Docket 2010: Trying Cases in the Eastern District of Virginia, Virginia CLE, December 2010
- Speaker, Recent Developments in Patent Law That Every Company Should Know, December 4, 2008
- Speaker, "Intellectual Property Damages," The Law of Damages in Virginia, Virginia CLE, July 2008
- Speaker, "What To Do When You Get The Letter: Tips From Experienced Intellectual Property Litigators on What to Do When Your Client is Accused of Trademark Infringement or Trade Secret Misappropriation," Bar Association, 118th Annual Meeting, January 2008
Insights
- Author, Trade Secrets: What You Should Know From 2024 to Prepare for 2025, McGuireWoods Legal Alert, January 22, 2025
- Author, Patent Reform Expected to Become Law, McGuireWoods Legal Alert, September 16, 2011
- Author, False Marking Claims for Products Stamped with Expired Patents, McGuireWoods Legal Alert, June 16, 2009
- Author, Patent Reform Act of 2009 – Odds of Becoming Law Improved, McGuireWoods Legal Alert, April 3, 2009
- Author, Fifth Circuit Grants Mandamus to Transfer Products Liability Case From Eastern District of Texas; May Affect Patent Cases, McGuireWoods Legal Alert, October 15, 2008
- Author, Best Practices for IP Ownership Issues in Technology Transactions, McGuireWoods Legal Alert, April 24, 2008
- Author, Federal Circuit Affirms Denial of Preliminary Injunction Seeking to Prevent Patent Owner From Contacting Defendant’s Customers, McGuireWoods Legal Alert, April 10, 2008
- Named “Lawyer of the Year,” Litigation – Intellectual Property, 2015, 2018, 2024; Litigation – Patent, 2016, 2019, 2024, 2025, 2026, Richmond, Best Lawyers in America
- Selected for inclusion in The Best Lawyers in America, Litigation-Intellectual Property/Patent, 2006-2026; Trade Secrets Law, 2022, 2024, 2025, 2026; Patent Law, 2025, 2026
- Selected for inclusion in Leading Lawyers, Intellectual Property, Southern Virginia, Chambers USA, 2004-2025
- Named to “Virginia Super Lawyers,” Intellectual Property Litigation, Business Litigation, Super Lawyers, Thomson Reuters, 2006-2025
- Named to “Legal Elite,” Intellectual Property Law, Virginia Business, 2009-2021, 2023, 2024
- Selected for inclusion in “Legal 500 United States,” Intellectual Property: Trade Secrets (Litigation and Noncontentious Matters), 2021, 2022
- Named a Client Service “All Star,” BTI Consulting, 2020
- Named a “Local Litigation Star,” Intellectual Property, Benchmark Litigation, 2013-2016, 2018
- Named an “IP Trailblazer,” National Law Journal, 2016
- Named to “The Lawdragon 500 Leading Lawyers in America,” Intellectual Property, Lawdragon, 2012, 2013
- Named “Virginia Litigator of the Year,” Benchmark Litigation, March 2012
- Fellow, American Bar Foundation
- Fellow, Litigation Counsel of America, Trial Lawyer Honorary Society
- AV Rated, Martindale-Hubbell